Below is a list of all the lenses I've reviewed, except the
Konica Minolta versions of the Sony rebadges. I've included a quick blurb with my thoughts about each lens. There
is a link to the review in blue, and if you would like to check the price, or buy that lens, I'd appreciate it if you'd use
the "Check price here" link to B&H Photo, that helps support this site.
Keep in mind the thoughts below are mine, based on my particular use. You may prefer a different lens for
a different reason, or may not be so concerned about the negatives or positives I've given it.
|16mm F/2.8 Fish-eye
This is a cool lens, and it works very well, although it's not for everyone. Never go anywhere with just
this lens, the fish-eye effect gets old after awhile, and you'll want a conventional lens to save your sanity. Check price here
16mm F/2.8 NEX
This is a very small wide angle pancake lens for the NEX system. Soft along the image periphery wide open, but
pretty sharp all over at F/5.6-8. Check price here
A very good landscape lens, but watch your focusing as you stop down. Out performs the CZ 16-35mm at 20mm
when used carefully. Check price here
24mm F/2 Carl Zeiss
Very sharp in the centers at nearly all apertures, plus low coma in the corners for good hand-held street shooting
in low light. Watch the mid-sections, they're soft at large apertures. Check price here
Sharp in the centers, but not nearly as good as the Minolta 28mm F/2 model along the image periphery. Check price here
30mm DT F/2.8 Macro SAM
Very small macro, and very short distance to subject at close focus, which is a negative. Works very well
as a landscape lens, but requires perfect focusing for sharp shots. A good lens for vacation, or to keep in your pocket
on a hike or outdoor event. Check price here.
35mm F/1.4 G Fast wide angle
, but F/1.4 is quite soft. A
good low-light street or photo-journalist lens. Not a very good landscape lens as the image periphery is a little soft
even stopped down, use the Minolta AF 35mm F/2 for landscapes, or if you're going to use F/2 most of the time, where it outperforms
the Sony 35mm F/1.4 G. Check price here
35mm DT F/1.8 SAM
In my opinion, is the best performance/price value in the Sony line-up. Equals 52.5mm on an APS-C camera.
A great walk around lens because of light-weight, small size, good focal length, fast aperture, and sharp wide open!
Check price here
Good lens, and least expensive fast lens for Sony and Minolta. Needs to be updated by Sony to correct for
coma at large apertures. For people using APS-C camera that will never upgrade to full frame, try the less expensive
Sony 50mm F/1.8, although it doesn't perform as well as the Sony 50mm F/1.4 in overall sharpness. Check price here
50mm F/2.8 Macro
Good sharp macro, but much more expensive than the 30mm macro above. Also has longer working distance than
30mm, but shorter than the 100mm macro. Check price here
135mm F/2.8 [T4.5] STF
This lens produces stunningly smooth bokeh, but is not very fast, only F/4.5.
It's also manual focus only. If you want speed in this focal length, get the much better Carl Zeiss 135mm F/1.8 above.
check price here
100mm F/2.8 Macro
The most desirable macro lens in my opinion since it has a longer working distance. Also good for
product shots if that's your thing. Check price here
300mm F/2.8 SSM G The very best telephoto lens
by far in this focal range,
with unmatched image quality. Also, the only lens that works well using the Sony 2.0x tele-converter. Check price here
500mm F/8 reflex
A good long telephoto lens if you don't have much money. Lacks contrast but provides good image quality
for the price. Discontinued in 2010. check price here
11-18mm DT F/4.5-5.6
A mediocre super wide angle zoom, not my favorite. I prefer the sigma 10-20mm F/4-5.6 for better corner
sharpness and slightly wider coverage. Somewhat pricey for build quality and optical performance. check price here.
16-35mm F/2.8 SSM Carl Zeiss
My favorite super wide angle lens. Has great color and contrast, but is prone to ghosting when bright lights
are near. Much better overall than the Minolta AF 17-35mm F/3.5 G. It's a pricey lens, but worth it in my opinion.
Check price here
16-50mm DT F/2.8 SSM
Is quite sharp at F/2.8, but F/4 provides a nice contrast boost. Has excellent image quality across the
whole frame at the longer end. Very similar to the lens below, but is faster and has a slightly better build quality.
A 'DT' lens, so APS-C cameras only. Check price here
16-80mm DT F/3.5-4.5 Carl Zeiss
If you like looking at your images closely, this lens is impressive. It's very sharp, even in the corners
at longer lengths. A great focal range I think. Similar performance to the Sony 16-105mm and 16-50mm above.
A "DT" lens, so only for APS-C cameras. check price here
16-105mm DT F/3.5-5.6
Another very good lens, and very similar in performance to the more expensive CZ 16-80mm above, plus it provides
a little more reach. On the downside, it has more color fringing at the long end. Worth the price. Check price here
18-55mm DT F/3.5-5.6 SAM kit lens
Much better image quality than the old 18-70mm kit lens, and a good deal in a kit. If you use the old kit lens
because it's small and light, I'd be worth spending the money to upgrade to this lens. Check price here
18-70mm DT F/3.5-5.6 kit lens
The old kit lens for Sony and Konica minolta. Was a decent lens on a 6mp camera. Not available anymore,
thankfully. Buy the newer 18-55mm above.
18-200mm F/3.5-6.3 NEX zoom
A super-zoom quite similar in optical performance to the "DT" 18-200mm directly above, but with a much better
build quality, internal focusing motor and optical Steadyshot. check price here
18-250mm DT F/3.5-6.3
A good "do it all" lens. Also know as a vacation lens because it's probably the only lens you'll
need to take with you unless you're critical about overall image quality. check price here
28-75mm F/2.8 SAM
This is the same as the Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8, except Sony puts in SAM. I found my Tamron model is slightly
better at the longer focal lengths, and is much less expensive. check price here
No longer offered by Sony. This lens works well, and represents a very useful focal range.
Quite noticeable color fringing on the long end, and massive light fall-off at 24mm. Used prices are cheap, making it
a great value.
Sigma, Tamron, Vivitar, and other lens reviews
Sigma 8-16mm F/4.5-5.6 DC HSM
For APS-C cameras. Super sharp at the wide end, and very good through the rest of the zoom range.
Great for artistic images and non-traditional views of urban environments.
Sigma 12-24mm F/4.5-5.6 (D) EX DG For full frame, but works well on APS-C. A really wide angle zoom, in fact, the widest available as of
the review date. know how to use this lens properly, otherwise, careless use results in bad pictures. Check price here.
Sigma 10-20mm F/4-5.6 EX DC
Minimal ghosting and sharp corners makes this lens great for interior/Real estate photography. Odd distortion
curve at the wide end, so keep straight lines away from edges. Great for interior/Real estate at the longer end.
Check price here
Sigma 10-20mm F/3.5 HSM EX DC
Very sharp in the centers at all apertures and focal lengths. Corners are quite soft at some focal lengths.
Simple distortion curve. More color fringing than less expensive model above. Great for interior/Real estate at
the longer end. Check price here
Vivitar 7mm F/3.5 fisheye
This inexpensive lens works very well, and provides a larger coverage area than the Sony 16mm fisheye mentioned above.
It's a manually operated lens, but is super easy to use, set it at F/11 in good light, and focus it at infinity, and have
fun shooting! Check price here
Sigma 85mm F/1.4 EX DG HSM
Very sharp centers from F/1.4 to F/8. The sides are a little soft at really wide apertures, but sharpen up well
a couple of stops down; the extreme corners are soft at all apertures. A good alternative to the super expensive Sony
CZ 85/1.4. Check price here
24mm F/2.8 A good wide angle prime, but not my favorite. Stopped down hard the image periphery is fairly sharp.
28mm F/2.8 The same as the Sony 28mm F/2.8, and much less expensive. I'm not sure if the coating have been upgraded on
the Sony though.
28mm F/2 One of the best wide angle lenses from Minolta. Is almost
flawless on an APS-C camera. Massive coma on full frame at F/2-2.8.
35mm F/2 My favorite Minolta lens. Is super good on full frame,
and basically flawless on APS-C. Less coma than 28mm F/2.
50mm F/1.7 This lens is ok for the price, but the F/1.4 version is much better. For APS-C cameras, consider the Sony
50mm F/1.8 SAM.
50mm F/3.5 macro A decent half-size macro, but for APS-C cameras, get the much
better Sony 30mm F/2.8 full size macro.
100mm F/2 A very good medium telephoto fast lens. I would prefer this lens over the 85mm F/1.4 for most work.
135mm F/2.8 Small and lightweight. Sharp at F/2.8 in the centers, but has some veiling haze and color fringing. No
distortion on APS-C or full frame. Light fall-off is not a problem. Overall, a very good lens for the money.
AF tele-converters 1.4x, 2.0x APO II Less expensive alternative to the Sony versions. These TCs do not support the "D" function on
the newer lenses that allow TC attachment.
300mm F/4 APO G (HS) Works very well for the price, and is fairly small and light-weight.
Has very noticeable color fringing along the sides on full frame. I'd get the Sony 70-400mm instead of this lens.
17-35mm F/2.8-4 (D)
This lens turned in a good review, in fact I'd rather have this lens than the much more expensive "G"
17-35mm F/3.5 G Has a good build quality and great handling, but has seen better days. There is too
much ghosting and the used prices are way too high. Get the Sony CZ 16-35mm which is far better.
24-50mm F/4 Small and light, but so is the more useful 24-105mm F/3.5-4.5. A lens that might have been good back
in the day, but that day has passed.
28-75mm F/2.8 (D) I think this lens is pretty much the same as the new Sony
and Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8, and the used prices make it a great bargain.
28-70mm F/2.8 G A nicely built lens, and doesn't extend when zooming which makes it handle well.
Sharpness is about the same as the new CZ 24-70mm, but ghosting control is poor.
28-85mm F/3.5-4.5 I didn't care much for this lens, so I decided to wreck it and report my findings. I think the new 18-55mm kit lens is a better choice for APS-C cameras.
28-135mm F/4-4.5 This lens turned in a very good performance, especially for
its age. The wide end is a little soft around the edges, but centers are pretty sharp at all apertures and focal lengths.
The original kit lens back in the mid 1980s. Works well, but not really a good choice now days in my opinion.
35-80mm F/4-5.6 shutter cap
This is an awful lens, and would be a good candidate to tear apart on a rainy day just for kicks, (if you can get one
70-210mm F/4 beercan
Good medium speed telephoto zoom. Not as great as everyone thinks. I prefer the 100-200mm F/4.5 below,
and it's only a third of a stop slower, big deal, that's offset by a much smaller and lighter package.
This lens works well at the long end, but falls very short in quality around 70mm. Prices are cheap on
eBay, but I'd go with the beercan above if you're looking for a medium fast telephoto zoom.
75-300mm F/4.5-5.6 big beercan Well built and reasonable sharp. Is slightly better
than the newer cheap version, but not worth switching, buy the new 70-300mm G lens from Sony.
80-200mm F/4.5-5.6 shutter cap A small and lightweight lens,
but not a very good performer. A better choice would be the Sony DT 55-200mm for APS-C users, or the lens above or below.
100-200mm F/4.5 My favorite Minolta zoom. I like it better than the
70-210mm F/4 for reasons stated above.