introduces a couple of new DSLRs with live view, plus the A200 from earlier in the month. They also "announced"
the 24-70mm F/2.8 and the 70-300 F/4.5-5.6 G SSM lens, which were announced several months ago, the latter appearing in the
lens brochure put out by Sony for a while now. I don't know why everybody's all excited over this old news. I've
put up a page with screen-sized shots of the two lenses, and the two cameras. The A300-350 are the same in appearance,
the only real difference is the model name and megapixel count on the left-hand side.
out the high-res shots here.
- Sony α350 and α300
- Live-view using a CCD in viewfinder.
- Sensor shift image stabilization.
- No AF assist lamp
- Tilt-able display, but not swing-out.
- A300 Shoots at 3fps, unlimited
in JPEG, or 6 RAW. A350 only 2.5fps.
- shutter 30 - 1/4000.
- Battery gets 730 shots per charge with LV
- ISO 100-3200
- Info-lithium batteries.
- CF1-CFII card slot.
- Can take optional battery grip.
in March/April with kit lens for: A300 $799, or A350 $899
has introduced a very expensive fixed-lens camera. The 11.1mp, 28-400mm zoom will retail for a whopping $799.
For that price you can get a DSLR in a two lens kit. This camera is using the 2/3" super CCD HR for a "new
dimension of beauty" or so they say. Go here to see a "new dimension of beauty."
I viewed the sample shots and must say, I'm not really impressed---for an $800 camera. They look like typical
small sensor images. Of course, they're all at ISO 100. Check out the blue sky pic and see some mottling and
smeared details. The ad says "Genesis of Nature Photography Digital Camera" what the crap does that mean?
It must've lost something in the translation. On the bright side, if you're not enlarging your images, these
shots will look just fine. It has a manual focus and zoom ring (that's good) like the Olympus SP-570 UZ below.
Also, this is a heavy camera---918g or almost 2lbs!
- Fuji FinePix S100fs
- 11.1mp 2/3" CCD
- 28mm-400mmm F/2.8-5.3 14.3X lens.
- CCD shift
image stabilization, plus digital.
- 2.5" 230,000 LCD.
- Manual focus and zoom rings.
- Shoots at
3fps at 11.1mp up to 7 frames.
- 1/4000-30 sec.
- Lithium-Ion battery, no numbers yet.
- ISO 100-3200 and
6400-10000 in reduced mode.
- 25mb internal memory, SD or xD cards.
- Flash hot-shoe---big deal.
heavy camera, 918g or nearly 2lbs.
- Ships in February for $799.
when you thought is was safe to buy an SP-560, Olympus comes out with yet another super-zoom. This time it's a 20x
26mm-520mm F/2.8-4.5 with a (what's claimed) manual focus and zoom ring. It has an AF/MF switch on the side of the
lens, so I'm thinking you turn off AF to manually focus with the ring, or when AF is switched on, you manually zoom with
the ring. Another possibility is a push-pull option. There isn't too much information right now on how this
works. If it does work with one of these methods, it could be a very attractive camera. The dimensions are the
same as my old(!) SP-550 UZ so it'll still be nice and small.
- Olympus SP-570 UZ
- 10mp 1/2.33 CCD
- 26mm-520mmm 20X lens.
- Optical image stabilization,
- 2.7" 230,000 LCD.
- Manual focus and zoom ring.....we'll see.
- Shoots at 1.2fps
at 10mp or 7.2fps at 5mp.
- 1/2000-15sec or 8 min bulb mode.
- Continues the use of AA batteries---good!
64-3200 and 6400 in reduced mode.
- 45mb internal memory or xD cards.
- Flash hot-shoe---big deal.
in March for $499.
posted the camera name that belongs to each picture below, but I threw you a curve. On the soft 75-300mm
lens-bottom row, I used the Konica Minolta 5D 6.1mp camera to compare to the A700. It doesn't seem to make any resolution
difference with the addition of twice the megapixels, but that's no surprise. On the top row, it appears the A100
is sharper, but it's really just the in-camera processing that's adding extra sharpening over the more reserved A700.
If I sharpened the A700, it would be the same as the A100. For the top row test I used the Sony 50mm F/1.4
lens at F/8, which is much sharper than the full telephoto (at F/5.6) shot with the 75-300mm. As you can guess,
it really makes no difference simply adding 20% more megapixels with a sharp lens, or 50% more with a soft lens.
This topic might make a good page length article...coming soon.
I've posted a couple dozen photos from my Thursday visit to the 2008 Barrett-Jackson
collector car auction in Scottsdale, AZ. Included are many ISO 800 and 3200 samples, though small in size for
quick viewing. All images taken with the Sony A 700. Check out the colorful shots here
All you megapixel maniacs out there might want to stare at the two sets of images
below and tell me which ones are 10.2mp, and which ones are 12.2mp. I took both images in the top
set with the same lens, and both images in the bottom set with the same lens, but different from the top. I performed
no image editing other than an upsample of the A 100 images to match the A 700s size. Both are full
(+) crops from the center of the image. I left the metadata intact for those of you who can't wait! I'll
let you know in a few days which ones are which.
The Sony A 700 has a great magnifying feature on
the beautiful 3" LCD, especially for checking focus. You push the AF/MF button with your right thumb in playback
mode, then zoom-in using the rear wheel. Once you get the appropriate magnification, use the front wheel
for viewing your other shots at the same magnification, in the same area, very handy. You just have to remember
to frame your shots the same so you don't have to do any scrolling. This is a great feature, which more than
makes up for the slow scroll rate.
Another nice touch: if you've been using manual focus, and turn the camera
off, it'll come on in auto focus---that's good, as I've actually ruined more than a few shots (on my A 100) by
forgetting to reset the switch to AF.Sony A 700 running review.
|Sony A 100 10.2mp
|Sony A 700 12.2mp
|Konica Minolta 5D 6.1mp
|Sony A 700 12.2mp
server problems yesterday, so I wasn't able to post my review page for the A 700. Go here to check it out
. So far, I've come up with a few random observations, plus the requisite product shots. Also, I've compared
the A 700 and A 100 side-by-side in my standard ISO table. The A 100 only goes to 1600, meaning I had a couple
of empty boxes to use, so I put in an upscaled Konica Minolta 5D ISO 3200 next to the A 700, then I used an ISO 1600 full
crop from the Panasonic Lumix FX100 against the ISO 6400 from the A 700---not as bad as you might think!
news; has anyone heard anything about the Sony DT 55-200mm lens that was bragged up by Sony a few months ago? My lens
brochure I received with the A 700 has it listed as a regular item, but I can't find it for sale anywhere.
Also, the 24-70mm CZ F/2.8 isn't listed in the brochure at all, but the 70-300mm G SSM is
listed and says it'll
be available "spring 08" or so they say.
One more item of note: one of the bigger camera review sites
has a "first impressions review" of the new Sony A 200. Now I'm not claiming to be a great product shot
artist, but the shots they posted are pretty bad. It's clear to me they aren't really interested in
the camera. I don't normally like to slam other people and their sites, but they must've been having a bad day
when they created this article, it's almost funny. Digitalcamerainfo.com
So we'll kick off the new year with a review of the Sony A 700, an intermediate level camera or "advanced amateur"
model as Sony calls it. This DSLR is designed to take some bread and butter away from Canon and Nikon. How will
it compare to the Canon 40D or Nikon D300? I don't know because I don't have those cameras. I do have
the Sony A 100 on hand, so we can check to see what a paltry difference 2 megapixels make, and how the ISO images differ
at various sensitivities. Page link opens Monday.
This will be the now-normal running review, which will take a little longer than usual, so check back every few days
to see the updates. I'll start posting thoughts and product photos tomorrow, with maybe some sample
shots of the studio still life taken from the Konica Minolta Maxxum 5D, the Sony A 100 and A 700, all using the same lens.
|Sony A 700 kit (US) minus the remote control
I've finished my three week nap, now I'm ready to doing something constructive, like post a brand new camera, see below!
Actually, I really haven't been busy lately---read lazy. I did manage to get a few things done. Sharp-eyed visitors
will notice I posted a
, with yet another one in the works, and
added a few things to the "coming soon
" page. I'm going to do a regular review of the Sony α 700
starting next week. I know I said I might not be getting one but, times change. I guess I'm
all pumped up over the new year. But seriously, I highly doubt I'll be reviewing the Sony A 200 below. It appears
as though Sony has pulled a Nikon and will go with a totally entry level DSLR with the A 200. It isn't much different
than the A 100, though It looks like it lacks a DOF button. From pictures it looks like it may take the new battery
but I'm not sure yet on that one
Yes. There may be questions regarding Kelvin WB settings, so
stay tuned. Also, it's very close to the Konica Minolta 5D with the dedicated ISO button and "fn" button.
I never did like the function dial on my A 100. Let's hope with the new AF system it'll be more accurate with focusing.
Funny, but I haven't seen one single picture of the bottom of the camera yet...
No more secret,
just a regular bottom.Sony α 200 home.
- Sony α 200
- 10.2mp CCD sensor.
LCD with 230,000 pixels.
- JPEG 3fps unlimited.
- ISO 100-3200.
- No AF illuminator.
- Image stabilization
- No more function dial.
- Retains eye-start autofocus.
- CF I &II slot, no Memory stick adapter.
claims it's smaller and lighter than A 100, but the specs read the same as the A 100.
- No wireless remote,
only wired like A 100.
- New battery, Info Lithium.
- New dedicated ISO button.
- Optional vertical battery
- Flash (auto) pop-up button, so no tedious pulling.
- No depth of field preview button?
no Kelvin WB settings, not sure though.
- Priced at $699 with kit lens, or $899 for two lens kit.
(US) in February or March '08.